AXES Example (Ind) · Industrial and manufacturing · run MRUN-2026-06-11-A

Your branding here

Automation Execution Report

An example report produced to the AXES open standard.

This is an example. The branding slots show where your organisation's identity would sit. The standard is open; the report is yours to brand.

This is the quality and control view - prepared for quality assurance, quality engineering, and inspection roles.

Read it as you would a report that crossed your desk. The questions at the end ask what it would need to be one you could rely on.

Quality and Control View - MRUN-2026-06-11-A

1. Controls relevant and evidenced

Three preventive quality gates (control set ctl:part-release/v5.1) were evaluated pre-release for each unit [env:0004 | controls.control_evaluation_phase]:

#SerialCritical characteristicCTL-DIM-01 dimension in toleranceCTL-SPC-02 process capability (Cpk >= 1.33)CTL-MAT-03 material lot verifiedQE disposition
01IMP4471-0001�25 H7 borepassed (17.9%)passed (Cpk 1.92)passed (HT-88213)not_required
02IMP4471-0002�25 H7 borepassed (51.5%)passed (Cpk 1.71)passed (HT-88213)not_required
03IMP4471-0003�25 H7 borepassed (95.6%)passed (Cpk 1.41)passed (HT-88213)not_required
04IMP4471-0004�25 H7 borepassed (37.0%)passed (Cpk 1.80)passed (HT-88213)not_required
05IMP4471-0005�25 H7 borepassed (13.3%)passed (Cpk 1.95)passed (HT-88213)not_required
06IMP4471-0006�25 H7 borepassed (62.4%)passed (Cpk 1.63)passed (HT-88213)not_required
07IMP4471-0007�25 H7 borepassed (31.1%)passed (Cpk 1.83)passed (HT-88213)not_required
08IMP4471-0008�25 H7 borepassed (7.8%)passed (Cpk 1.98)passed (HT-88213)not_required
09IMP4471-0009�25 H7 borepassed (44.1%)passed (Cpk 1.74)passed (HT-88213)not_required
10IMP4471-0010�25 H7 borepassed (27.6%)passed (Cpk 1.86)passed (HT-88213)not_required
11IMP4471-0011�25 H7 borepassed (9.9%)passed (Cpk 1.97)passed (HT-88213)not_required
12IMP4471-0012�25 H7 borepassed (32.5%)passed (Cpk 1.82)passed (HT-88213)not_required
13IMP4471-0013�25 H7 borepassed (20.9%)passed (Cpk 1.89)passed (HT-88213)not_required
14IMP4471-0014�25 H7 borepassed (18.1%)passed (Cpk 1.90)passed (HT-88213)not_required

Result: 42/42 control evaluations passed; 0 failed; 0 bypassed; 0 not_observed. Quality-engineer disposition was not_required under policy v5.1’s rule for characteristics inside tolerance on a released drawing revision [env:0004 | authority.approval_basis]; consequently no manual-disposition assertion is made or needed for this run - the control relied upon is the released-tolerance + verified-material-lot pair, both evidenced above.

2. Population and completeness (IPE basis)

  • Population definition: MES production order PO-IRN-2026-4471-06 at 06:55Z (14 planned) reconciled against finished-goods goods-receipt GRN-2026-06-11-IMP4471 (14 booked, 0 scrap) - independently reconciled, not self-reported [env:0073 | reconciliation.population_basis].
  • Coverage: envelopes 14/14 (100%); tamper-evident 100% [env:0073 | reconciliation.evidence_coverage_ratio].
  • Sequence continuity: envelope sequence numbers 0001-0076 contiguous, no gaps (stream-internal proof); heartbeats at 60s intervals, zero silent windows (silence semantics) [env:0009 | liveness.declared_heartbeat_interval_s].

3. Evidence quality

  • Origin/basis: runtime-observed on the shop-floor edge; release confirmations are quality-system confirmed (QIF 3.0 CONFORMING per unit) and source-system corroborated (ISA-95 batch record) [env:0007 | evidence_quality.corroboration_state] [env:0073 | evidence_quality.corroboration_state].
  • Corroboration coverage decomposition: anchored 100% � quality-receipted 14/14 � provider-only 0.
  • Point-in-time validity: policy v5.1 effective from 2026-05-01, in force at every event [env:0007 | authority.policy_version]; drawing rev D released 2026-03-20; delegation valid 2026-04-15 to 2026-12-31.
  • Model context: sampling parameters recorded (temperature 0.2, top_p 0.9); replay claim scoped - reproducible in distribution, not in instance [env:0002 | model.sampling_parameters]; reasoning artifacts provider_withheld - disclosed, not silent [env:0002 | model.reasoning_artifact_availability].

4. Findings register

No exceptions, deficiencies, or open actions arise from this run. One observation (OBS-001, advisory): peak characteristic utilisation 95.6% with the lowest capability of the batch at Cpk 1.41 - recommend a process-capability review for the �25 H7 bore before the next batch. Owner: manufacturing process owner. Due: next production cycle.

This report is produced to AXES, an open, public working-draft standard for automation execution evidence, stewarded by Magentix AI. The standard is developed in the open and invites review.

See the standard's origin on GitHub

Other views of the same evidence

The Golden Trace example is published in several role-specific views. Each option below opens the same underlying record, framed for a stated profession. Select a view to read it, or share a link with a colleague whose role differs from yours.

Each view ends with the same review questions. The public requirements register is strengthened when multiple professions contribute.

Review this example

You have read the example report above. The questions below ask what would need to change before you could rely on a report like this in your role. Your answers are added to the public AXES requirements register.

Common questions (every reviewer)
Questions for your role

A part can pass every gauge while nobody recorded which drawing revision and material lot the release was actually authorised against.

Attribution and contact
E1. May we credit you as a design partner on the standard? * Design partners are acknowledged in the standard's contributor record. This is standards review, not a testimonial.